As captured in the National Kawula17 Survey
(NKS) Q1 2026, the economy (64%) and poverty (59%) are the two main concerns for
Indonesians, especially for those with junior/senior high school level
education (67%). Nonetheless, this concern is not a niche problem affecting
only one segment of society but also appears across multiple demographics. This
pattern suggests that the concern is systemic rather than isolated, driven
by underlying structural conditions, such as the labour market and the cost of
living, including high food prices.
Economic concerns are primarily
expressed through immediate realities, such as the difficulty of finding stable
employment and the rising cost of food and staples. The issue is not only that
economic challenges persist, but that responses to government performance in
economic and poverty issues are seen as insufficient.
Although the government has introduced
programs such as the 19 million jobs initiative,
labour concerns remain a top priority for 43% of Indonesians. At the same time,
a majority (54%) express dissatisfaction with the program. This gap suggests
that existing initiatives, while ambitious in scope, have yet to address the
structural challenges faced in the labour market.
Individual blame for poverty assumes
that improving one’s economic condition is primarily within individual control.
However, the patterns reflected in the NKS Q1 2026 findings suggest a more
complex reality.
Structural poverty refers to societal
structures that produce unequal outcomes across groups, placing some at greater
risk of poverty and hardship (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2025). This reflects
the NKS Q1 2026 findings: while economic and poverty issues are significantly
more crucial for those with lower levels of education, they remain a vital topic
among most Indonesians.
Reframing the issue from individual responsibility
to structural conditions does not negate the role of personal agency. Rather, it
oftentimes highlights that individual outcomes are shaped within a broader systemic
agency that determines access to opportunities and resources. This translates
to the unemployment rate becoming the most pivotal concern for 45% Indonesians.
Ultimately, addressing economic
marginalisation requires a closer alignment between policy design and lived
experience. As the NKS Q1 2026 findings illustrate, economic pressure is not an
abstract concern, but one felt directly in daily life. Recognising the
structural dimensions of poverty can help inform responses that are not only
more targeted but also more effective in addressing the challenges faced by
different segments of society.
Check our full National Kawula17 Survey (NKS) Q1 2026 report (in Bahasa Indonesia) here.

![[ARTICLE] Economic Marginalisation and Structural Poverty: Individual Blame or Systemic Ruin?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvwynfrwyvpfhhbnqvcjd.supabase.co%2Fstorage%2Fv1%2Fobject%2Fpublic%2Fkawula17-assets%2Fimg%2Fartikel-article-economic-marginalisation-and-structural-poverty-ind-cover.jpg&w=3840&q=75)




![[ARTIKEL] Generasi Muda Peduli Pemilu, P](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvwynfrwyvpfhhbnqvcjd.supabase.co%2Fstorage%2Fv1%2Fobject%2Fpublic%2Fkawula17-assets%2Fimg%2Fartikel-artikel-generasi-muda-peduli-pemilu-pentingkah-cover.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
![[ARTIKEL] Apa itu UU Pemilu dan Mengapa](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvwynfrwyvpfhhbnqvcjd.supabase.co%2Fstorage%2Fv1%2Fobject%2Fpublic%2Fkawula17-assets%2Fimg%2Fartikel-artikel-apa-itu-ruu-pemilu-dan-mengapa-perlu-ada-revisi-cover.jpg&w=3840&q=75)